|
►Is progress a red
herring? The Yamaha SR500Elean, clean and crewcutmight make you wonder. Could
it be that the swift march of technology is carrying street motorcycles into a
future more fanciful than fun? Is it possible that froggy buzzers, blazing
lights, digital readouts, instrument clusters, built-in stereos, heated
handgrips, rear-view mirrors with electric defrosters, and third, fourth, fifth
and sixth cylinders are subversive; or worse, some pinko conspiracy to reduce
true-blue, Type-A-Positive American Manhood to limp vanilla pudding? Will this
single-cylinder, you-kick-it-to-life motorcycle rescue our sport? And doesn't
the SR500E belong to an era when Dick. Tracy shot the perpetrators square
between the eyes without ever reading them their constitutional rights, when
Audie Murphy blew away entire enemy regiments in black-and-white war movies, and
when Lois Lane would step into a telephone booth with nothing more serious in
mind than the Daily Planet's phone number?
Well, sorry. You square-jawed heroes who think
Seventies-style motorcycling has gotten soft without sprained ankles and
brightly colored hematomas will find little of the 1950s in Yamaha's SR500E.
It's not a revival machine that transports the aches and pains and oil leaks of
1952 forward to the threshold of 1980. On the contrary, this 500 single is a
thoroughly modern motorcycle.
To say that
the conceptan agile 500cc four-stroke singleis "old" misses the point.
Sometimes a good idea seems to be frozen in metal, inextricably tied to a
particular set of machines in a given time-frame. But a good idea is a really
timeless thing. And so the big-bore single-cylinder roadster has come back;
rethought, re-engineered and reconstituted in all its mechanical specifics.
Yamaha's new
street bike has been developed out of the XT500 and TT500 dirt bikes, but even
here the lineage tends to be more apparent than real. The SR500E is not a
street-bike adaptation of the XT500. To be sure, TT, XT and SR all have 87 x
84mm engines, and the XT and SR units both have 9.0 to 1 compression ratios and
share basic driveline components. However, in many important respects the SR500E
engine is a creature unto itself.
The SR500E
cylinder head has larger fins for better heat dissipation compared to the XT;
and while Yamaha has not changed cam timing, the inlet and exhaust tracts have
been reshaped to get better performance. Most of the work has gone into the
inlet side of the engine where the SR has a 34mm Mikuni carburetor feeding a
47mm intake valve, compared to the XT's 32mm carb and 45mm poppet. Further
changes in the cylinder head include new valve-seat material to improve the
durability of the seat when using low-lead or non-leaded gasoline, and the
exhaust valve guide has been standardized with the intake guide.
Yamaha has
not overlooked the piston. The pin-boss area of the 500's piston has been
strengthened, the overall length of the piston has been increased by six
millimeters, and Yamaha has modified the piston's oil ring. Street riders
probably use more revs over longer time periods with less maintenance than their
dirt-riding counterparts, and Yamaha has made all these modifications to guard
against excessive oil consumption.
Downstairs
in the crankshaft department, Yamaha increased the flywheel capacity by
extending the diameter of the crank webs, claiming a benefit in reduced
mechanical noise. Moreover, the material in the forged and hardened crankshaft
was changed in the redesign.
Cost and
appearance considerations probably led to the disappearance of the magnesium
side covers found on the dirt singles. Both the left and right side covers on
the SR500E are buffed-out aluminum. Yamaha spent their money in other ways: The
SR500E has a hoop around the clutch housing to strengthen this component, detail
changes have been made to some transmission gears to increase their durability,
and the shift pawl and drum have been modified in order to get easier, more
positive shifting. Specifically, the toothed primary pawl, instead of being
splined to the shift shaft, is integral with the shaft; now there's nothing to
loosen or slip. And the shift drum is supported on the left side by a new needle
bearing that reduces drum drag and facilitates smooth gear-changing.
The fussing
with the crankshaft assembly suggests Yamaha's concern with vibration, a
traditional complaint about the big single. That concern shows elsewhere, but
not necessarily in a way the casual observer might expect. The XT has one rubber
and three solid mounts that attach the engine to the frame, whereas the SR500E,
far from being rubber-mounted all the way round, is solidly fixed to the frame
at all four points. Enormous soft-rubber bushings, like the old Norton system,
would have isolated the thumping vibrations of the 500 single from its frame.
Yamaha rejected this complicated and expensive option. Elaborate soft-mounts or
counter-rotating balancers were out of the question too; those solutions
violated the simplicity and cost-effectiveness that Yamaha wanted in the SR500E.
So the engineers did more homework on frame design and solid engine mounting in
order to hold the vibration through the frame to an acceptable level.
Outfitting
the 500 for street duty included a new frame. The tubework may be based on the
XT500, but frame-tube diameters have been increased and key points of the frame
have been reinforced to increase rigidity. A strong and fairly massive frame
that clinches the engine tightly can carry off engine vibration without
fracturing, transmitting some of the pulsing through the suspension to the
ground. To illustrate where vibration can go, step back five feet from an idling
SR500E, watch the bike move on its suspension, and then put your hand to the
pavementand feel the quaking.
No wonder
that the rear fender, gas tank and footpegs are rubber-mounted. In fact, even
the caliper mounts for the rear disc brake have rubber bushes to soften the
vibration. The battery-box space has been made large to provide more room so
that longitudinal vibrations won't rattle the battery against nearby components.
Incidentally, the side cover and battery box have been designed in such a way
that both the battery and tools (under. a lockable cover) can be removed from
the left side of the bike, and the air cleaner can be pulled out from the right.
Because the under-seat items come out the sides of the motorcycle, the seat is
bolted in position. It doesn't lift up on hinges.
Compared to
the XT500, the SR500E has considerably less rake (27.7 degrees vs. almost 31
degrees) and trail (4.7 inches vs. 5.7 inches), producing a quicker-steering
bike. The front and rear suspension units more nearly resemble the components
found on the XS650 than those fitted to the XT500. Indeed, the SR500 has no
off-road capability with a front fork that travels only 6.0 inches, whereas the
XT is good for 7.8 inches. At the rear, very ordinary oil-damped shocks provide
4.4 inches of rear-wheel travel, while the XT500's forward-cant DeCarbon shocks
allow the rear wheel 6.4 inches of movement. The SR500E also has a slightly
shorter wheelbase (56.25 inches) than the XT's 57-inch span. Not surprising is
the fact that the 383-pound SR-E packs 64 more pounds than the XT.
Some of the
extra baggage has gone into the electrical system. The SR500E has 12-volt
electrics charged by a multi-pole alternating-current magneto, instead of the
XT's six-volt system with a direct-current flywheel magneto. And the
breaker-points ignition fitted to the XT500 has not been carried over to the
SR-E. The roadster has a magnetically triggered CDI to fire the spark plug.
Yamaha has
provided more than an energetic spark-maker in order to persuade the SR500E into
life. Obviously an electric starter would contradict the notion of a
light-and-lithe, simple-and-direct single-cylinder roadster. In addition to the
starting lever, there's plenty of gadgetry. First, one manfully gets the
kickstart lever under foot, hopefully under cover of a good boot. Of course
Yamaha figured some owners would step to the starting drill with frazzled
tennies, and so the company took pains to protect its light-footed Customers
from the uplifting and crippling effects of The Dread Single Cylinder's Recoil &
Backlash Through The Starting Lever, And Subsequent Catapult Over The Moon.
Using the compression release which lifts the exhaust valve, one cranks the
works over until a little white arc appears in a tiny window at the right
outboard side of the overhead camshaft.
Then one
flicks the choke lever, provided that the engine is cold, and pushes the white
throttle-set knob, located nearby the choke lever, into its up-position. With
the ignition switched on, and with care not to crack the twistgrip open, the
rider thrusts the starting lever downward and awaits those comforting ka-thunka/ka-thunka
sounds to well up from the engine department. Failing that, one again consults
the old peekaboo window, gives a macho ah-what-the-hell-l-was-only-kidding
shrug, and continues to kick.
Until our
test SR500E was broken in fully, and until we learned not to flood the thing
(the Mikuni has an accelerator pump), and until experience demonstrated that the
throttle-set knob should be trusted to raise the throttle-slide the exact
amount, the SR500E would either start on the first or second kick or not at all.
One Cycle staffer (not an editor) managed to kick the Yamaha into a deeper and
deeper case of moodiness until at last he was squirting sweat and frustration
from every pore in his body, and nearly a gallon of sweat collected behind his
jacket's tightly secured wrist cuff, waterlogging his right arm all the way to
the elbow. Without so much as a burp of encouragement, the SR-E refused to
push/bump start, and the hapless novice only succeeded in leaping aboard from
the left side, skidding the rear wheel, and toppling overbike and allinto a
steaming, cursing heap.
The Yamaha
never so cursed the life of the editorial staffers, and firing off the SR500E
was simple and easyafter learning what to do, and what not to do. In fact, the
neatest trick in the whole start-up routine is resetting the start-throttle
knob. The rider just rolls the twistgrip back against its fast-idle position,
thus returning the throttle-set button to its off-position. Thereafter, the
engine always drops down to its 850- 900 rpm slow-idle speed.
Everyone who
rode the SR500E agreed: The motorcycle is enormous fun. Not an awesome
motorcycle, not dazzling, not brilliantbut fun. Those riders who have grown up
on electric-start twins and fours were intrigued by the single-cylinder Yamaha
because it represents a different approach to connecting Points A and B on
tarmac. The SR500E is a machine of essentials; a responsive, glove-fit
motorcycle.
That
motorcycling concept may be fun, but in the real world sometimes being fun isn't
enough. After all, steam calliopes are fun, Excalibur roadsters are fun,
fifty-year-old two-wheeled crocks are fun. But any modern single-cylinder
motorcycle must meet the hard test of reality. What can it do? How does it
perform? To make sense in a world of thousand-dollar kick-start twins from
Honda, Kawasaki, Suzuki and Yamaha, the $1500 SR500E must perform better in some
dimensions than the econo-twins. Granted, you can't buy anything like the SR-E
from another source; Yamaha has the corner on the 500cc single-cylinder roadster
market. Nevertheless, a 50 per cent premium is a lot to pay just to be
different.
In
functional terms, the SR500E starts with substantial advantages. It is a
specialty motorcycle, a fairly narrow-focus machine, and isn't subject to the
kinds of compromises that econo-twins must unavoidably make. Consider the simple
matter of seating. In order to attract a broad range of customers, the 400 twins
must offer reasonably comfortable accommodations for passengers, and this
strategy dictates fairly long, heavy, cushy seats. On the other hand, the Yamaha
SR500E is basically a monoposto device, scaled to one person.
Yamaha has capitalized on this seeming limitation. In the first place, the
distance between the seat and the rider's footpegs is great enough for real leg
room: no semi-double-back positioning.►
|